Skip to main content

Logging and nice graphs

Hi all,

This week I worked on improving the system we use for logging. Well, it was not really a "system" but rather a pile of hacks to measure in custom ways timings and counts and display them. So now, we have a system :-)

The system in question was integrated in the code for the GC and the JIT, which are two independent components as far as the source is concerned. However, we can now display a unified view. Here is for example pypy-c-jit running pystone for (only) 5000 iterations:

The top long bar represents time. The bottom shows two summaries of the total time taken by the various components, and also plays the role of a legend to understand the colors at the top. Shades of red are the GC, shades of green are the JIT.

Here is another picture, this time on pypy-c-jit running 10 iterations of richards:

We have to look more closely at various examples, but a few things immediately show up. One thing is that the GC is put under large pressure by the jit-tracing, jit-optimize and (to a lesser extent) the jit-backend components. So large in fact that the GC takes at least 60-70% of the time there. We will have to do something about it at some point. The other thing is that on richards (and it's likely generally the case), the jit-blackhole component takes a lot of time. "Blackholing" is the operation of recovering from a guard failure in the generated assembler, and falling back to the interpreter. So this is also something we will need to improve.

That's it! The images were generated with the following commands:

PYPYLOG=/tmp/log pypy-c-jit
python pypy/tool/ draw-time /tmp/log --mainwidth=8000 --output=filename.png
EDIT: nowadays the command-line has changed to:
python rpython/tool/ draw-time /tmp/log --mainwidth=8000 filename.png


pollo wrote on 2009-11-02 01:09:

Nice work.
I think you'll cause a revolution when this project delivers its goals, opening python (and other dynamic languages) to a much wider range of uses.

René Dudfield wrote on 2009-11-02 07:56:

ooh, pretty graphs :) It's been very good to follow pypy progress through the blog.

Can the gc/jit be made to take up a maximum amount of time, or be an incremental process? This is important for things requiring real time - like games, audio, multimedia, robots, ninjas etc.

A note, that some other languages do gc/jit in other threads. But I imagine, pypy is concentrating on single threaded performance at the moment.

I'm sure you're aware of both those things already, but I'm interested to see what the pypy approach to them is?